Publication:
Supply-side benchmark pricing in a dual banking system: evidence from Indonesian Islamic deposit rates
| DC Field | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ziyaad Mahomed | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-12T08:41:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-12T08:41:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Do depositors discipline Islamic banks in a dual-banking system by reallocating funds when Islamic returns fall below conventional rates, or does Islamic-conventional rate co-movement arise from bank-level pricing behaviour? Using 117 months of tenor-specific data from Indonesia (June 2014 to February 2024), we test the spread to-flow mechanism that the standard displaced-commercial-risk narrative presupposes. The Islamic-conventional spread does not predict aggregate Islamic deposit flows (?? = 0.002, p = 0.681; R� < 1%), and the null survives asymmetric specification, enriched controls, alternative spread definitions and tenor-matched flow regressions. A Shapley-Owen R� decomposition attributes 87�91% of the explained variation in Islamic rate changes to conventional benchmarks across the four tenors. The in-sample R� is low (3�5%), but the qualitative ranking is supported by a levels specification and is directionally consistent with a rolling out-of-sample comparison. A nonlinear ARDL model and local-projection impulse responses both show that Islamic rates respond faster to conventional rate cuts than to rate increases at the 3-month tenor; the evidence for asymmetry at other tenors is weaker and does not survive a change of method. We read the deposit-flow null as evidence against active aggregate depositor discipline rather than as a rejection of bank-level discipline operating through other channels. The benchmark-dominance and asymmetry results agree with supply-side benchmark pricing without uniquely identifying it. These findings caution against treating mudarabah-deposit pricing in a low-share dual banking system as evidence of risk-sharing, whether in monetary-transmission models or in governance frameworks. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Mahomed, Z. (2026). Supply-side benchmark pricing in a dual banking system: Evidence from Indonesian Islamic deposit rates. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 110, Article 102202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2026.102202 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2026.102202 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1062-9769 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ikr.inceif.edu.my/handle/INCEIF/4355 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. | en_US |
| dc.rights | � 2026 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. | |
| dc.source | SEDONA | |
| dc.subject | Deposit rate pass-through | en_US |
| dc.subject | Benchmark pricing | en_US |
| dc.subject | Dual banking system | en_US |
| dc.subject | Islamic banking | en_US |
| dc.subject | Displaced commercial risk | en_US |
| dc.subject | NARDL | en_US |
| dc.subject | Local projections | en_US |
| dc.title | Supply-side benchmark pricing in a dual banking system: evidence from Indonesian Islamic deposit rates | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| ikr.doctype | Scholarly Works | |
| ikr.topic.maintopic | Islamic banking | en_US |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 4f8b920e-6954-48c5-aa66-888d6fa99924 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 4f8b920e-6954-48c5-aa66-888d6fa99924 | |
| Appears in Collections |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Supply_side_benchmark_pricing_in_a_dual_banking_system_evidence_from_Indonesian_Islamic_deposit_rates_Ziyaad Mahomed.pdf
Size: 2 MB Format: Adobe Portable Document Format
Views: 0 Downloads: 2